U.S. Appeals Court Affirms No Copyright in AI-Generated Works

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision refusing copyright registration of an artwork created by Artificial Intelligence.

The appellant, Stephen Thaler, is no stranger to court cases focused on the copyrightability of AI-generated works. The computer scientist has repeatedly petitioned to have his various AIs legally recognized as authors, creators, or inventors for ...

Google Removes Restrictions on AI for Weapons and Surveillance

Google has recently updated its AI ethics guidelines, removing previous restrictions on using its technology in weapons and surveillance. This policy change marks a significant shift in Google’s position on the use of AI for national security purposes. Previously, Google’s AI principles included a section listing “Applications we will not pursue”, which explicitly prohibited the use of AI in weapons, ...

Israeli Supreme Court Warns of AI Hallucinations in Pleadings

Despite the Israeli Supreme Court’s landmark ruling last month which criticized the irresponsible use of generative AI to draft documents in legal proceedings, litigants continue to submit court filings citing AI-hallucinated court cases.

Several days after the previous ruling on the same subject matter, the Supreme Court outright rejected a petition that once again included AI hallucinations. The rejected petition ...

Apple’s Encryption Standoff with the UK: Legal Risks to Personal Privacy

Apple recently removed its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) feature in the UK, following a governmental order to allow circumvention of personal data encryption.

The British government, acting under the Investigatory Powers Act, demanded covert access to users’ encrypted data, effectively forcing Apple to create a backdoor. Rather than compromise its encryption, Apple chose to remove the ADP feature for UK ...

U.S. Copyright Office Considers AI-Generated Content and Copyright Protection

A recent U.S. Copyright Office report addresses copyright protection for AI-generated content, concluding that existing legal doctrines are sufficient to resolve questions of copyrightability. The report also dismisses the arguable need for additional copyright protection for purely AI-generated content.

The report, which analyzed over 10,000 public comments received in response to a Notice of Inquiry, emphasizes that copyright law has ...

Institutional Shareholders Sue Meta Over GDPR Fines

Following the record-breaking $1.3 billion fine imposed by the Irish Data Protection Commission on Meta in 2023, two of Meta’s institutional shareholders, both pension funds, have filed suit against the company due to “improper handling of user data”.

The plaintiffs assert “credible suspicions” that the board of directors and senior leadership are responsible for the privacy violations, which resulted in ...

Israeli Labor Court Clarifies Employer’s Use of Surveillance Cameras

In a recent landmark decision, the Israeli National Labor Court clarified the conditions for lawful use of surveillance cameras at the workplace, without it constituting an actionable degradation in work conditions.

The ruling addresses an appeal against the regional labor court’s decision that had essentially assumed that any use of surveillance cameras at the workplace is deemed an actionable degradation ...

AI Developers Face Growing Legal Scrutiny Over Copyrighted Datasets

Recent legal developments highlight a judicial trend toward scrutinizing the datasets used in AI model training, as part of the continued legal struggle over copyright infringement allegations against AI developers.
In Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware found that Ross Intelligence infringed Westlaw’s copyrights by using Westlaw headnotes to train its AI-based ...